National Press Day, celebrated annually on November 16th, commemorates the establishment of the Press Council of India (PCI) and serves as a vital reminder of the press's role as the "Fourth Estate." Yet, as India celebrates this day, a profound question persists: Does the world's largest democracy truly enjoy freedom of the press? The answer, upon close examination, is complex, residing in a precarious balance between strong judicial safeguards and severe, escalating on-ground pressures.
The Constitutional Promise: Article 19(1)(a)
Legally, the freedom of the
press in India is robustly defended. Although the Constitution does not
explicitly name it, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that press freedom is
implicit and foundational to the "right to freedom of speech and expression"
guaranteed to all citizens under Article 19(1)(a). Landmark
judgments, such as Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950) and Sakal
Papers Ltd. vs. Union of India (1962), have firmly established the media’s
right to publish, circulate, and criticise the government.
This constitutional backing
provides the theoretical "oxygen of democracy." However, Article
19(2) simultaneously permits "reasonable restrictions" in
the interests of state sovereignty, security, public order, decency, morality,
and defamation—a provision that has increasingly become the legal tool used to
curb journalistic activity.
The Ground Reality: A Sharp Decline in Global Rankings
External assessments offer a
stark contrast to the legal foundation. In the 2024 World Press Freedom Index
compiled by Reporters Without Borders (RSF), India was ranked 159 out
of 180 countries, placing it in the category of nations where the situation
for journalists is considered "very serious" or
"difficult." While this was a marginal improvement of two places from
the previous year, the overall score indicates a rapid decline in recent years.
This low ranking is a symptom
of four major challenges facing the Indian media landscape:
1. Physical and Legal Threats to Journalists
The most immediate and
concerning threat is the physical safety of journalists, particularly those
reporting on corruption, land mafias, and political wrongdoing at the local
level. Reporters Without Borders notes that journalists face "all-out
harassment and attack campaigns."
- Physical Violence and Impunity: Despite
legal provisions, violence against media workers often goes unpunished,
fostering a climate of fear that encourages self-censorship.
- Misuse of Colonial-Era Laws: Critics
argue that laws like Section 124A (Sedition) of the Indian Penal Code,
defamation laws (which are both civil and criminal offences in India), and
counter-terrorism acts are increasingly weaponized to silence dissent,
label critical journalists as "anti-national," and justify
arrests or prolonged detentions, as seen in the targeting of certain
independent news organizations.
2. Economic and Political Pressure
The economic context presents
an equally potent challenge. Most large media houses are heavily dependent on
advertising revenue, a significant portion of which comes from the central and
state governments. This financial lever creates an environment where editorial
independence is easily compromised.
- The Rise of "Godi Media": This
colloquial term refers to media outlets accused of becoming
"mouthpieces of the government," exchanging critical scrutiny
for political patronage and favorable advertising contracts.
- Concentration of Ownership: The
media market is increasingly dominated by a few large corporate
conglomerates, often with close ties to the ruling political
establishment, which further limits pluralism and diversity of opinion.
3. State Control over Digital Space
With rising internet
penetration, the digital domain has become a new battleground. The government
possesses broad powers to restrict online content and communication, often
citing national security or public order.
- Internet Shutdowns: While
the frequency has reduced in recent years, India continues to be one of
the leading countries globally for imposing localized internet shutdowns,
severely hampering the ability of journalists to report on conflicts and
unrest, such as those witnessed in the Northeastern states.
- The New Regulatory Landscape: Recent
legislation, including the Telecommunications Act and the Digital Personal
Data Protection Act, introduces new governmental powers that can
potentially restrict online communications and content, raising concerns
about surveillance and further curbs on digital reporting.
4. The Crisis of Credibility and Polarization
The freedom of the press is
also undermined internally by a growing crisis of media credibility. The
proliferation of 'fake news' and 'paid news'—where favourable coverage is
bought—has eroded public trust. Furthermore, the media, particularly certain 24/7
news channels, has become heavily polarized. This sensationalist, high-decibel
political reporting often overshadows fact-based investigative journalism,
leaving citizens struggling to distinguish objective reporting from political
propaganda.
A Democracy Under Watch
India’s press freedom is not
dead, but it is severely endangered. The spirit of National Press Day, which
recognizes the press as a watchdog, is currently under severe strain from all
sides: physical danger, legal intimidation, economic dependence, and digital
restrictions.
The fundamental right exists
in the Constitution, but its daily exercise requires immense courage. For press
freedom to truly flourish, India needs a revitalized commitment from the
judiciary to curb the misuse of draconian laws, a stronger public demand for
independent, non-partisan journalism, and an industry-wide resolve to
prioritize editorial integrity over corporate or political interests. Until
these checks are truly effective, the freedom of the Indian press will remain a
vibrant ideal perpetually shadowed by a challenging reality.
- Abhijit
No comments:
Post a Comment